It looks for use having particular verbs or in a particular feeling of the brand new verb

/bi-/ has been advertised to possess locative-terminative force unlike purely locative push to possess indiancupid /ba-/, however, Thomsen says to your p. 184, this “is likely perhaps not immediately used in why off concord having an excellent loc.-label. otherwise loc. noun, nonetheless it as an alternative suits brand new semantic distinction of your verb. “

>ba(I): enjoys a good separative mode. When you look at the OBGT they directly correlates which have >Akkadian t-stems. (Thomsen, adopting the Jacobsen, confuses t-stems >on Akkadian finest.) Its standing try immediately following the latest ventive >marker yards and therefore the b is actually soaked up: m-ba- > m-ma, of course this is >followed closely by a second people pronoun, it will become m-ma > m-mu (very ba >isn’t necessarily simple to understand). About lack of the >ventive marker they uses up the original status from the chain, immediately after which it >do not often be distinguished of ba(II). A clear circumstances try >ba-ne-su8-be2-en-de3-dentro de = ni-it-tal2-lak cu-nu-ci = i go-away >to them (OBGT VII, 305). > >ba(II): has a good stative/inactive setting. Within the OBGT VI, it’s rendered because of the >a c-base stative/couch potato, or an enthusiastic Nt-base passive. Seem to, ba(II) >occupies the initial updates from the strings. ba-ab-gar, ba-ab-gar-re-dentro de >= cuckun, cuckunaku = he has been put / I’ve been set >(by anyone unnamed). New versions ba-gar, ba-gar-re-en, . ba-na-gar, >ba-na-gar-re-dentro de in the OBGT VI, contours 160-165, try not clear; they’re able to >as an alternative feel translated due to the fact ba(I), particularly the second collection, >that is several-new member, and also the OB grammarian, whom made him or her >from the Nt-stalk passives, besides managed the new ambiguity. > >Your own declaration demonstrably relates to ba(II), but Really don’t think it is simply a good >matter of preference, after one has set ba(I) aside. However, it’s >method away from my resources and you will my personal competence to check on my personal significantly more than >syntactical/lexical says from unilingual messages. > >With my all the best, >Peter J. Huber

I was thinking of all of the intransitive phrases you to stop that have ba-Supply, instance ba-gul, “it was missing”. As you say, those individuals fall in the course away from ba(II).

I would personally possess imagine it actually was an excellent >Hebrew phrase, but then once more, I am not sure the connection of the Sumerian >code and the Hebrew words

Many thanks for making the effort to attempt to describe so it material. I can you will need to overview just what Hayes is wearing profiles 162 and you can 256: He believes you to definitely scholars provides speculated there is generally two ba- conjugation prefixes that are homonyms. “One is viewed chiefly inside the couch potato phrases, another from inside the reduced definable contexts.” Also, this new conjugation prefix bi2- both happen that have moderate phrases regarding locative-terminative case as well as the conjugation prefix ba- either takes place which have affordable sentences in the locative circumstances. “It is this pattern from co-density that has led multiple scholars to summarize one to bi2- and you will ba- are not of the same score because other conjugation prefixes, and are generally most likely comprising multiple element.” Thus that style of ba- start from a component you to definitely is short for the new locative situation. To possess a great separative meaning, you would expect locate Sumerian affordable phrases end into ablative postposition -ta.

Note the brand new refined huge difference >made in OBGT VI, outlines 79-84, between your normal Grams-stalk stative >while the C-base stative/passive: an-gar, an-gar-re-en = cakin, >caknaku = he or she is place, I’m put, vs

>I found myself wanting to know for people who you’ll answer a question personally. You will find understand somewhere >your label “Eden” try a good Sumerian phrase. > >At any rate, in the event the Eden, Adam, and/or Eve was Sumerian terms and conditions, do you >please let me know if they have an interpretation/definition?

EDIN are an excellent Sumerian phrase, nonetheless it refers to the steppe homes between them canals, where herd pet grazed.